Cases capture the human stories, and shape public debate and establish new expectations. They affect the wider community awareness can reflect, but lead to new laws often. Issues and decisions of judges and law student bread and butter. Here are a few you will come across:
Neighbor care:
In 1932, launched Mrs Donoghue and the modern law of negligence, having found her ginger beer less than attractive. Known to generations of law students as "snail in the bottle" situation, it's best known for the famous neighbour principle Lord Atkin. In the Declaration we shall take reasonable care to avoid harming those expect could be affected, has created when owe duties towards each other. Accidents and injuries was forever to be restructuring and compensation claims.
Foreign detainees
Defines the resolution, there is no better case Belmarsh which modern setting boundaries between national security and civil liberties. A Committee of nine Law Lords decided, resolution 2004 an important milestone in the protection of judges all of the rule of law and human rights. In defiance of labor policy of indefinite detention of suspected foreign terrorists without charge, the majority said the British State acted illegally in a discriminatory manner. In a strong rejection, said Lord n
Spanish fisherman.
Provide legal background to the convening of the European Union and doubt in 1991, Factortame case of Spanish fishermen rights lost to fish in British waters are a mainstay in any course of law General. She emphasized the primacy of European law on the work of the United Kingdom Parliament, thus striking a blow against the legal sovereignty of Parliament. And it raised a lot of constitutional debate about how European powers-Britain's relationship with Europe as a whole.
McLibel
Officially the longest case in the history of la justice, esta ten years David against Goliath battle defamation justice price when companies take on individuals. Suing fast food giant green activists Helen steel and Dave Morris for libel over a scathing pamphlet criticizing ethical credentials. McDonalds walked away with the win and both public relations disaster. The European Court of human rights later in 2005 announced that the pair, who are funded has been representing themselves, have been deprived of their right to a fair trial.
0 التعليقات: